Skip to main content

Manufactured Landscapes

The film demonstrates the importance of imagery in conveying context. A chinese man whose photo was taken at the three gorges dam commented "It's a very broad view. It's hard to see the detail." And I think this comment was more relevant to our context halfway around the world, than the image itself. The film provides a new perspective on your personal belongings.

One of the most striking scenes is of a shipbreaking shore in Chittagong, Bangladesh - showing what happens to our oil tankers. We see them manually disassembled in the film and the 18-20 year old men who scrape the leftover crude from the bottom.

I would like to thank Dr. Webber for giving us this assignment because I've wanted to watch this film since last semester and never got around to it. It's fantastic and I highly recommend it. The trailer is a little doomsday, so see relevant clips here. Just ignore the creepy music in it and the film.

A quote by the photographer explains the point of the film best:
"There are times when I have thought about my work and putting it into a more politicized environment. If I said "this is a terrible thing we are doing to the planet", then people will either agree or disagree. By not saying what you should see, that may allow them to look at something they have never looked at and see their world a little differently. So I think many people today sit in that uncomfortable spot, where we do not necessarily give up what we have, but we realize what we're doing is creating problems that run deep. It's not a simple right or wrong, it needs a whole new way of thinking."


The film begins with 7 minutes of silence as a camera strafes the length of a manufacturing and assembly plant. You see the chinese workers, and the succession of manual labor that goes behind our irons and fans.

The film then moves from a newly assembled iron to a piece of iron scrap metal in an enormous pile of scrap metal. Workers are sorting the waste and being berated for laziness. We then see beautiful mosaics of beer cans compressed into neat cubes.

The point of these images is to show how massive the manufacturing and waste services of China is. How these operations are mostly manual labor, because it's so cheap. And most importantly, as Burtynsky tells us that 50% of the worlds computers end up in China, that you and I are responsible for it. Our e-waste is taken apart by the Chinese people for valuable scrap and the toxic materials inside have permanently ruined their water tables.

Next, the film moves onto the energy that drives China's development as the world's scapegoat (my own opinion.) Burtynsky recounts when he was driving and realized that oil not only powered his car, but went into his plastic steering wheel, the paints, and manufacturing of the glass. Oil, he says, "is the key building block of the last century." It allows us "mobility and freedom." Now that China is the manufacturer of the world, it will have a very different energy footprint. "How long will they be able to sustain?"

Not sustain it.

How long will they sustain?

Some facts from the film: Coal plants are built weekly in China and 27 Nuclear plants are planned over the next 10 years.

The biggest proof of the importance of energy is the Three Gorges Dam. It will include 26 700,000 kW generators and 6 back-up generators, capable of producing 84.7 billion kWh/year.

You can see a lot of these images in the article by David Carlson at http://davidreport.com/200705/industrially-altered-landscapes/


To build this dam, 1,100,00 people were relocated. We see them in the film, hired to tear down their own homes and cities and rebuild them out of the way.

The film makes me wonder about the importance of growth and production, energy and materials, over people. But most importantly, it reveals that this importance is something we all share responsibility for and that takes place every day, everywhere.

Comments

Most Popular Posts

A Few Thoughts on Privilege and then Affirmative Action

In 2014, David S. Pedulla found that black gay men would receive salaries similar to their straight male counterparts due to what he identified as "privilege" [ 1 ]. Although being black made a man seem more aggressive, being gay made him seem more effeminate. So, being black and gay seemed to "cancel out" and result in salaries that were higher than straight black men and gay white men. Reading this study by Dr. Pedulla and the reflections by gay black men writing about the study, I began to realize that the issue here is in our definition of privilege. No one wants to be hired just because they are white, gay, female, or otherwise labeled.  Privilege, as a useful definition for achieving equality, is not primarily about material benefits. Privilege is being seen and treated as an individual.   When you are seen and treated as an individual, rather than a box, you are more likely to be valued for your skills. Whether or not these findings are generally ...

Sustainable Wardrobe Sourcing Mishaps

Since reading " Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Fashion " by Elizabeth Cline , I've had a new-found need to make my wardrobe more sustainable. I applied Marie Kondo 's method to identify which items I wanted to keep and which I needed to thank for their service and give away or recycle or turn into rags. I made the vow to buy clothes to replace when necessary, and not to fulfill a shopping desire or urge. I also made the vow to source all new clothing more responsibly. That means features like: Organic cotton GOTS Certified Fair Trade Recycled materials   Some of this effort has gone pretty well. I bought a clearance organic cotton dress from Pact to wear as a night dress along with 95% organic cotton panties. Many of these items are fair trade and GOTS certified. I also got a regular cotton dress from Passion Lillie that is fair trade and dyed in a supposedly more environmentally friendly process. Unfortunately, I've had a number of p...

Ecological Footprint Calculators

This post is to log and share some ecological footprint calculators and give people an idea of the over consumption that we take for granted. I first encountered these calculators for a class assignment and they now form the basis for my career! Hope everyone learns something. (you can click to expand the pictures of my results as of 12.04.2008) Redefining Progress is the best calculator, I think. You can pick a lot more countries. If everyone is a vegan, drives almost never, carpools, lives with 5 other people in a large apartment building in the inner city, never flies, maintains a garden, buys almost never and always organic/sustainable, uses 30% renewable energy, buys carbon offsets, and takes every measure to recycle and conserve resources. Then we need 0.87 earths. That's perfect! The Footprint Network and Earthday Site use scales and not numbers (which is nice) and try to draw a picture of your lifestyle. The Ecology Fund is a very short and sweet version. The WWF has a ...