Skip to main content

Knitting, math and the "female mind"

Knitting and math are obvious best buds. Sara-Marie Belcastro's article, Adventures in Mathematical Knitting published in American Scientist (Vol. 101, N. 2, March-April 2013, also online) has a lot of great examples.

But it seems like knitting, because it has often been performed by women, has not always been seen as a technical or mathematical endeavor. Men, having generally had a monopoly on creating the studies of intelligence and aptitude, have generally also had a monopoly on deciding what is and isn't technical.

Here's a quote from a lecture by Richard Feynman, presented at the fifteenth annual meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, 1966 in New York City.
"I would like to report other evidence that mathematics is only patterns. When I was at Cornell, I was rather fascinated by the student body, which seems to me was a dilute mixture of some sensible people in a big mass of dumb people studying home economics, etc. including lots of girls. I used to sit in the cafeteria with the students and eat and try to overhear their conversations and see if there was one intelligent word coming out. You can imagine my surprise when I discovered a tremendous thing, it seemed to me.

I listened to a conversation between two girls, and one was explaining that if you want to make a straight line, you see, you go over a certain number to the right for each row you go up--that is, if you go over each time the same amount when you go up a row, you make a straight line--a deep principle of analytic geometry! It went on. I was rather amazed. I didn't realize the female mind was capable of understanding analytic geometry.

She went on and said, "Suppose you have another line coming in from the other side, and you want to figure out where they are going to intersect. Suppose on one line you go over two to the right for every one you go up, and the other line goes over three to the right for every one that it goes up, and they start twenty steps apart," etc. --I was flabbergasted. She figured out where the intersection was. It turned out that one girl was explaining to the other how to knit argyle socks. I, therefore, did learn a lesson: The female mind is capable of understanding analytic geometry. Those people who have for years been insisting (in the face of all obvious evidence to the contrary) that the male and female are equally capable of rational thought may have something. The difficulty may just be that we have never yet discovered a way to communicate with the female mind. If it is done in the right way, you may be able to get something out of it."

It's said that women "are not as interested" in technical pursuits and math. There are a lot of examples of actually technical and mathematical activities that women perform quite well that may not traditionally "interest" men. What do you think?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

A Few Thoughts on Privilege and then Affirmative Action

In 2014, David S. Pedulla found that black gay men would receive salaries similar to their straight male counterparts due to what he identified as "privilege" [ 1 ]. Although being black made a man seem more aggressive, being gay made him seem more effeminate. So, being black and gay seemed to "cancel out" and result in salaries that were higher than straight black men and gay white men. Reading this study by Dr. Pedulla and the reflections by gay black men writing about the study, I began to realize that the issue here is in our definition of privilege. No one wants to be hired just because they are white, gay, female, or otherwise labeled.  Privilege, as a useful definition for achieving equality, is not primarily about material benefits. Privilege is being seen and treated as an individual.   When you are seen and treated as an individual, rather than a box, you are more likely to be valued for your skills. Whether or not these findings are generally ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sustainable Wardrobe Sourcing Mishaps

Since reading " Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Fashion " by Elizabeth Cline , I've had a new-found need to make my wardrobe more sustainable. I applied Marie Kondo 's method to identify which items I wanted to keep and which I needed to thank for their service and give away or recycle or turn into rags. I made the vow to buy clothes to replace when necessary, and not to fulfill a shopping desire or urge. I also made the vow to source all new clothing more responsibly. That means features like: Organic cotton GOTS Certified Fair Trade Recycled materials   Some of this effort has gone pretty well. I bought a clearance organic cotton dress from Pact to wear as a night dress along with 95% organic cotton panties. Many of these items are fair trade and GOTS certified. I also got a regular cotton dress from Passion Lillie that is fair trade and dyed in a supposedly more environmentally friendly process. Unfortunately, I've had a number of p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ecological Footprint Calculators

This post is to log and share some ecological footprint calculators and give people an idea of the over consumption that we take for granted. I first encountered these calculators for a class assignment and they now form the basis for my career! Hope everyone learns something. (you can click to expand the pictures of my results as of 12.04.2008) Redefining Progress is the best calculator, I think. You can pick a lot more countries. If everyone is a vegan, drives almost never, carpools, lives with 5 other people in a large apartment building in the inner city, never flies, maintains a garden, buys almost never and always organic/sustainable, uses 30% renewable energy, buys carbon offsets, and takes every measure to recycle and conserve resources. Then we need 0.87 earths. That's perfect! The Footprint Network and Earthday Site use scales and not numbers (which is nice) and try to draw a picture of your lifestyle. The Ecology Fund is a very short and sweet version. The WWF has a ...
Post a Comment
Read more